Category: Top » Finance » Mortgage »


Author: roborg | Total views: 6 Comments: 0
Word Count: 699 Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 9:54 AM

Breaking the Law for Peanuts

It happens every day of the week. A borrower is told by their mortgage officer that the interest rate for their new mortgage will be higher than usual.

The reason? The borrower is seeking financing for an investment, or rental, property. The increase in rate seems significant so the borrower inquires about it. The loan officer explains that an investment property represents a higher degree of risk for a lender.

Then, what happens all too often, unscrupulous loan officers advise their clients to simply state that the home will be used as a second residence. Second homes typically carry the same rate of interest as a primary residence.

This is a very big mistake for two reasons.

The first reason is that this misrepresentation is a crime! Here is the exact wording that a borrower is asked to sign at the closing:

I have read and understand this Statement of Applicant. I understand that the making of false certifications or declarations is a crime under section 1014 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

You may not see this wording with your initial application but it will be there in the closing package. Most closings contain a form specifically addressing occupancy with the above wording directly below the statement.

Few people want to break the law. But adding the additional cost to words like "Oh, people do this all the time" from the loan officer, many people opt to mislead the lender. Of course the loan officer is also breaking the law by advising their client to do this, but very few ever get caught. But borrowers can get cauhght. Lenders check for occupancy on many of their loans. They check phone and tax records. It's actually pretty simple to catch these law breakers but because of the volume of loans that lenders provide, few people are ever convicted of this crime. And that is why so many people "take the chance".

But what is really puzzling about all this, is for how little people are willing to break the law. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are two government-sponsored agencies that purchase a large majority of the mortgages loaned in this country. The agencies have a set of rules. or "guidelines". If a loan falls within those guidelines, either entity will purchase the loan. The agencies take no issue with purchasing loans secured by investment properties other than they require a slightly higher fee, or interest rate.

How much higher?

That depends on how much is being borrowed. With a 10% down payment, there is an add-on of 2.5 points - each "point" represents 1% of the amount being borrowed. A $200,000 loan amount will cost a borrower $5,000 in order to get the very same rate they would get for a primary residence. A 20% down payment would have an add-on of 2 points and down payments of 25% or more would have an additional 1.5%. But these add-ons DO NOT have to be paid in upfront cash.

A borrower can elect to accept a higher interest rate rather than pay the extra fee. When paying points, borrowers are "buying down" the interest rate. The longer they have the mortgage, the more beneficial the rate "buy-down" becomes.

In a typically buy-down, one point (1% of the loan amount) will "buy down" the interest rate approximately 1/4 of 1%. If 1 point = 1/4%, then, 1/2 point = 1/8%. So a total of 2.5 points will be an approximate increase of 5/8% (0.625%). 2 points will be about 1/2% increase and 1.5 points will be around 3/8% (0.375%).

Going back to the above example of a $200,000 mortgage, at current interest rates, an increase of 5/8% adds $82 to the payment; a 1/2% increase is an additional $66 and 3/8% would add $49. Is it worth those kinds of numbers to break the law? I hope you feel like me and not even think twice.

Another part of this equation is that it becomes easier to qualify for an investment property because lenders will often use a portion of the projected rental income and add that to the borrowers regular income.

So follow Spike Lee's advice and "Do the right thing!"

About the Author

Ron Borg is the founder & CEO of Mortgage123.com - offering mortgage shoppers a safer way to comparison shop online.
http://www.Mortgage123.com
Questions may be directed to www.AskRonBorg.com
For a video library of many aspects of mortgage financing, go to: www.1866RonBorg.com




Rate, comment or bookmark this article

Seed Newsvine

Rating: Not yet rated

Bookmark this article in your preferred program
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments RSS

No comments posted.

Add Comment

Your Name:


Your Email:


Comment

Enter the code shown

Visual CAPTCHA



Popular Articles in this cathegory

1: Adjustable Rate Mortgages Are OK For The Short Run
When you go for mortgage quotes for the first time, you'll find there are generally two major options available. The first, and most commonly sought after, is a fixed rate mortgage. The second option ..

2: Reverse Mortgages: A Financial Solution for Those Caring for Aging Parents
Caring for aging parents can be a trying experience. As your parents or aging loved ones become more dependent on other people, you want to try and preserve as much self dignity as possible. Most ag..

3: Retirement Planning and Reverse Mortgages
Reverse mortgages are one of the most innovative and advantageous financial products available to Americans today. They aren't like refinance mortgages or second mortgages. Reverse mortgages actuall..

4: Reverse Mortgages or Relocation? A Guide for Retirees Ready to Enjoy Their Home Equity
If you're like most people, you're ready to retire at the age of 65 but need some way to supplement your income after the paycheck stops arriving. The good news for today's retirees is that all of th..

5: 10 Facts about Reverse Mortgages
Reverse mortgages are more popular than ever among those aged 62 and over. In fact, the number of RMs issued doubled between 2003 and 2005 yet many people still either haven't heard of reverse mortga..


Creative Commons License
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Spanish taslation