Category: Top » View » Code-83360

Use the html code provided below to reprint the article: "National Security Perspectives: A Post-Election Insider View" on your website
You can adapt the code to fit the style of your pages but you need to respect our Terms of Service

Title

Author

HTML code

article only

<h1>National Security Perspectives: A Post-Election Insider View</h1> by Sciencelogic Recently I participated in an event entitled National Security Perspectives held at the famous Congressional Country Club in Maryland. The featured panelists had impressive credentials from the NSA, DHS and the CIA. The topics of discussion ranged from Current Geopolitical Threats and Evolving Technology Demands to predictions about the New Administrations Intelligence, Defense and Homeland Security focus.
The panelists were: William P. Crowell: former Deputy Director of the National Security Agency Michael P. Jackson: Deputy Secretary, Department of Homeland Security Jose A. Rodriguez, Jr.: former Director CIA, National Clandestine Service &amp; CIA, DCI Counterterrorist Center
Overall, it was a very nicely arranged event on a brisk fall evening with about 100 CXO attendees; mostly large but some small government contractors and a few product companies like ScienceLogic that conduct business with military, intelligence and the public sector.
No surprise, given the financial crisis the economy is suffering from that the panelists said we also have a crisis coming on the Federal budget front. This will put enormous pressure on the way Administration thinks, and how and where to spend the $$.
Obama's tone regarding the issues he will be confronting in the world during the election was encouraging. Make the world more non-partisan and take on the threats that we have in front of us head-on!
The panel was very upfront about current threats. William Crowell said,
"It is highly imprudent to believe that there will not be another 9-11. We have to fund and support the work to stop other attacks. We can only mitigate risk but we can't eliminate risk. We have to try to absorb the sense of urgency and wake up every day looking at the intelligence screens as if 9-11 happened within the last couple of months."
He added,
"They (the intelligence community) need the innovation, sense of commitment and urgency that comes from the private sector - a sense of mutual commitment to that mission."
Predicted Priorities for investment for DHS: Cyber attack as the top issue Nuclear threats including dirty bomb Chemical and biological attacks Explosive attacks against critical infrastructure with maximum # of lives and or financial disruption / loss. Large scale natural disasters - hurricane + earthquakes Border penetration - identity management and border management issues
An Obama administration will spend dollars around these threat vectors. They will want to spend $$ to help state and local governments. Grants to state and local governments should significantly increase with the Obama administration, so think about how you will increase your focus on the state and local government spending initiatives.
Secure border investments - the panelists believe that the new administration will feel compelled to invest here. Michael P. Jackson bluntly said, "You have to make investments in border tools to get meaningful immigration reform."
Panelists agreed that the 1st year will be an intense period of scrutiny about fundamental directions. We can't afford it all at DHS; it is dramatically under budgeted. At TSA/DOT and then at DHS, we spent about $4 Billion on technology investments since 9-11; those investments are now reaching the end of the original service life.
One gripe from the panel that I found humorous: "We don't have a group of people who think like entrepreneurs." It is insane how long things last when you buy things in the government. As an example, we are still replacing vacuum tubes in some of the very old FAA gear; this is well beyond what any reasonable person would think these initial investments should/would last.
Final Thoughts: I actually think that the Obama Administration will be quite favorable to COTS software products, SaaS offerings, and creative financing initiatives from the private sector. The government just won't have the capital budget to do everything it wants to accomplish. I would say if you look at how intelligently and aggressively Obama used technology to assist his campaign, the odds are good that this new breed of IT talent (which is already really comfortable with SaaS products, blogs, wiki's, hosted/outsourced Cloud solutions; this team really understands the latest technology trends) will quickly work to bring these new IT paradigms to the Federal marketplace. Clearly the private sector can help the Government achieve more with lower capital budgets - beginning to provide services rather than transaction-based selling. Another clear idea is to think about leasing as a better way to work with the government which going forward will have increased budgets restrictions.
They will likely be in confrontation with members of Congress that won't change fast enough, however the future of our nation's ability to fight terror lies in becoming more efficient and effective. It requires the government be flexible enough to figure out what jobs and IT functions to outsource in a nimble and smart way. My prediction: this is great news for Service Providers. Overall the next 4 years should be great for our business as well as the Managed Service Provider/SaaS industry!
 <h2>About the Author</h2>David Link is president and CEO of ScienceLogic. He and his partners built a thriving company from the ground up by focusing on delivering "products that just work" to the underserved <a href="http://www.sciencelogic.com">IT infrastructure management</a> marketplace. He has held senior management and corporate officer positions at large public companies.
 <h3><a href="http://www.content4reprint.com/politics/government/national-security-perspectives-a-post-election-insider-view.htm" title="National Security Perspectives: A Post-Election Insider View">Article Source:</a> <a href="http://www.content4reprint.com" title="Free high quality articles">Content for Reprint</a></h3>

Tags/keywords

read the original article: http://www.content4reprint.com/politics/government/national-security-perspectives-a-post-election-insider-view.htm

sample HTML code

full page

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<meta name="keywords" content="security, government, software, IT Infrastructure," />
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow" />
<title>National Security Perspectives: A Post-Election Insider View</title>
</head>
<body><h1>National Security Perspectives: A Post-Election Insider View</h1> by Sciencelogic Recently I participated in an event entitled National Security Perspectives held at the famous Congressional Country Club in Maryland. The featured panelists had impressive credentials from the NSA, DHS and the CIA. The topics of discussion ranged from Current Geopolitical Threats and Evolving Technology Demands to predictions about the New Administrations Intelligence, Defense and Homeland Security focus.
The panelists were: William P. Crowell: former Deputy Director of the National Security Agency Michael P. Jackson: Deputy Secretary, Department of Homeland Security Jose A. Rodriguez, Jr.: former Director CIA, National Clandestine Service &amp; CIA, DCI Counterterrorist Center
Overall, it was a very nicely arranged event on a brisk fall evening with about 100 CXO attendees; mostly large but some small government contractors and a few product companies like ScienceLogic that conduct business with military, intelligence and the public sector.
No surprise, given the financial crisis the economy is suffering from that the panelists said we also have a crisis coming on the Federal budget front. This will put enormous pressure on the way Administration thinks, and how and where to spend the $$.
Obama's tone regarding the issues he will be confronting in the world during the election was encouraging. Make the world more non-partisan and take on the threats that we have in front of us head-on!
The panel was very upfront about current threats. William Crowell said,
"It is highly imprudent to believe that there will not be another 9-11. We have to fund and support the work to stop other attacks. We can only mitigate risk but we can't eliminate risk. We have to try to absorb the sense of urgency and wake up every day looking at the intelligence screens as if 9-11 happened within the last couple of months."
He added,
"They (the intelligence community) need the innovation, sense of commitment and urgency that comes from the private sector - a sense of mutual commitment to that mission."
Predicted Priorities for investment for DHS: Cyber attack as the top issue Nuclear threats including dirty bomb Chemical and biological attacks Explosive attacks against critical infrastructure with maximum # of lives and or financial disruption / loss. Large scale natural disasters - hurricane + earthquakes Border penetration - identity management and border management issues
An Obama administration will spend dollars around these threat vectors. They will want to spend $$ to help state and local governments. Grants to state and local governments should significantly increase with the Obama administration, so think about how you will increase your focus on the state and local government spending initiatives.
Secure border investments - the panelists believe that the new administration will feel compelled to invest here. Michael P. Jackson bluntly said, "You have to make investments in border tools to get meaningful immigration reform."
Panelists agreed that the 1st year will be an intense period of scrutiny about fundamental directions. We can't afford it all at DHS; it is dramatically under budgeted. At TSA/DOT and then at DHS, we spent about $4 Billion on technology investments since 9-11; those investments are now reaching the end of the original service life.
One gripe from the panel that I found humorous: "We don't have a group of people who think like entrepreneurs." It is insane how long things last when you buy things in the government. As an example, we are still replacing vacuum tubes in some of the very old FAA gear; this is well beyond what any reasonable person would think these initial investments should/would last.
Final Thoughts: I actually think that the Obama Administration will be quite favorable to COTS software products, SaaS offerings, and creative financing initiatives from the private sector. The government just won't have the capital budget to do everything it wants to accomplish. I would say if you look at how intelligently and aggressively Obama used technology to assist his campaign, the odds are good that this new breed of IT talent (which is already really comfortable with SaaS products, blogs, wiki's, hosted/outsourced Cloud solutions; this team really understands the latest technology trends) will quickly work to bring these new IT paradigms to the Federal marketplace. Clearly the private sector can help the Government achieve more with lower capital budgets - beginning to provide services rather than transaction-based selling. Another clear idea is to think about leasing as a better way to work with the government which going forward will have increased budgets restrictions.
They will likely be in confrontation with members of Congress that won't change fast enough, however the future of our nation's ability to fight terror lies in becoming more efficient and effective. It requires the government be flexible enough to figure out what jobs and IT functions to outsource in a nimble and smart way. My prediction: this is great news for Service Providers. Overall the next 4 years should be great for our business as well as the Managed Service Provider/SaaS industry!
 <h2>About the Author</h2>David Link is president and CEO of ScienceLogic. He and his partners built a thriving company from the ground up by focusing on delivering "products that just work" to the underserved <a href="http://www.sciencelogic.com">IT infrastructure management</a> marketplace. He has held senior management and corporate officer positions at large public companies.
 <h3><a href="http://www.content4reprint.com/politics/government/national-security-perspectives-a-post-election-insider-view.htm" title="National Security Perspectives: A Post-Election Insider View">Article Source:</a> <a href="http://www.content4reprint.com" title="Free high quality articles">Content for Reprint</a></h3></body></html>